Context: the author’s answer to open decision D2 (should the pieces use an LLM?), after asking what a version without an LLM would be good for. It turned two versions per piece into one mode per piece, and it added a standing style rule. Journal: session 02. Decision: ADR-0011.

I’d go for a sort of “B”, but without keeping the duality: each example must be either with or without an LLM. Starting without is right, both because it isn’t needed and because it limits complexity, so we can focus calmly on containment alone, even if it isn’t necessary (underline that, and why), and better appreciate when it does become necessary! Always underline the why of things.

(translated from Italian)

Why it matters: it set the arc of the series. The sandbox goes from formality (01–02) to necessity (03–05), and the articles state the reason for every step.